SELP
Get Early Access
Back to Blog

Fitness Myths vs Facts – What the Latest Science Really Says About Recovery, Warm-ups, Stretching, and Foam Rolling

Fitness Science
15 min read
SELP Team
August 21, 2025
A gym setting with various fitness equipment, representing the exploration of fitness myths and facts.
Debunking fitness myths with science-backed evidence.

The gym is full of folklore. From ice baths to foam rolling, from static stretching to lifting heavy, athletes and casual gym-goers alike repeat tips they've heard for years - often without checking if they actually hold up to science. Some of these practices are harmless but ineffective. Others may even limit your progress if used at the wrong time.

This article cuts through the noise by breaking down five of the most persistent fitness myths, drawing on recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses. You'll learn:

  • Where these myths come from
  • What the data really says
  • How to apply evidence-based swaps to improve performance, hypertrophy, and recovery

By the end, you'll have a clear, science-backed playbook for smarter training.

Myth 1: "Ice baths always boost recovery and next-day performance."

Fact: Cold water immersion (CWI) reduces soreness, but performance benefits are context-dependent.

A 2022 meta-analysis pooling 20 trials found that CWI:

  • Reduced delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) in the hours following training
  • Lowered creatine kinase (CK) at 24 hours and lactate at 24–48 hours
  • Had no significant effect on inflammatory markers like CRP or IL-6
  • Actually reduced countermovement jump (CMJ) performance immediately post-immersion (PMC9896520)

Coach's take: Ice baths can be useful for short recovery windows - for example, athletes in tournaments with back-to-back matches. But if your goal is long-term adaptation and muscle growth, blunting the inflammatory process with frequent CWI might not be ideal. Prioritize sleep, nutrition, and active recovery first.

Limitations: Many trials struggled with blinding participants (not surprising - it's hard to hide who's sitting in freezing water). Protocols also varied widely in temperature and duration.

Practical alternative: For most recreational lifters, active recovery and well-programmed rest days are as effective as ice baths, without risking blunted adaptation.

Myth 2: "Static stretching before lifting makes you stronger and safer."

Fact: Long static stretching before lifting actually reduces strength and power.

A comprehensive review concluded that:

  • Short static holds (≤60 seconds per muscle group) cause only trivial strength reductions (~1–2%).
  • Longer static stretches (>60 seconds) reduce strength and power by ~4–7.5% (PubMed31849713).

A 2023 network meta-analysis ranked warm-up strategies for explosive performance (sprinting and jumping):

  • Dynamic stretching or static + dynamic warm-ups enhanced performance.
  • Static-only warm-ups reduced output.
  • 7–10 minutes of dynamic stretching emerged as optimal (PMC10463540).

Practical swap: Save longer static holds for after your session or in separate flexibility training. Before lifting or sprinting, stick to dynamic warm-up drills that elevate heart rate and mimic movement patterns.

Myth 3: "Foam rolling breaks up adhesions and dramatically boosts performance."

Fact: Foam rolling helps with soreness and range of motion, but not by "breaking up" tissue.

A 2019 meta-analysis found:

  • Pre-rolling slightly increased range of motion (ROM) without impairing strength.
  • Post-rolling consistently reduced muscle soreness, with a moderate effect size (Hedges' g ≈ 0.47).
  • Sprinting and strength performance improvements were minor or inconsistent (PMC6465761).

Mechanism note: Foam rolling doesn't physically "break up adhesions." Instead, it likely works through neuromodulation - changing how the nervous system perceives pain and stretch.

Best use: Use foam rolling in short bouts (60–120 seconds per muscle group) to temporarily increase ROM or reduce soreness before key sessions. Don't expect it to be a magic bullet for performance.

Myth 4: "Any warm-up works – dynamic warm-ups are optional."

Fact: Dynamic warm-ups are consistently superior for explosive performance.

That same 2023 network meta-analysis (PMC10463540) showed:

  • Dynamic warm-ups (7–10 minutes) improved sprint and jump performance significantly.
  • Static-only warm-ups reduced explosive output.
  • Combining a brief static stretch with dynamic drills was also effective.

Practical template:

  1. 3–5 minutes light aerobic activity (jog, bike, row)
  2. 7–10 minutes dynamic drills (leg swings, skips, lunges, band walks)
  3. Movement-specific primers (jumps, sprints, barbell warm-up sets)

This combination prepares joints, muscles, and the nervous system without the downsides of static-only stretching.

Myth 5: "You must lift heavy to build muscle – light weights can't grow size."

Fact: Light loads with blood flow restriction (BFR) can build muscle similarly to heavy lifting.

A 2024 meta-analysis compared low-load BFR (20–30% 1RM) to high-load resistance training in untrained men:

  • Muscle hypertrophy: No significant difference between BFR and heavy lifting.
  • Strength: Heavy lifting still had the edge. However, when BFR was optimized (individualized cuff pressure, intermittent inflation, higher training frequency), strength outcomes were much closer (PubMed39598240).

Programming note: BFR is particularly useful for:

  • Rehab and injury recovery, when heavy loads aren't possible
  • Deload weeks
  • Athletes looking to reduce joint stress

But for maximal strength, heavy lifting remains superior.

Evidence Deep-Dive

Let's briefly look at how we know these facts:

  • Cold water immersion: 20 trials, mixed protocols, consistent findings on soreness relief but not performance gains (PMC9896520).
  • Static stretching: Multiple systematic reviews, large datasets, dose-dependent effects on strength (PubMed31849713).
  • Warm-up meta-analysis: Network meta-analysis with dozens of trials ranking methods - dynamic came out on top (PMC10463540).
  • Foam rolling: Meta-analysis covering sprint, jump, and strength endpoints; moderate effects on soreness (PMC6465761).
  • BFR: Recent 2024 meta-analysis of untrained males; hypertrophy equal, strength depends on load and protocol (PubMed39598240).

Limitations across the board:

  • Risk of bias in blinding (especially for ice baths).
  • Protocol heterogeneity (foam rolling times, water immersion temps, cuff pressures for BFR).
  • Populations studied (BFR evidence mainly in untrained males).
  • Acute vs. chronic outcomes - many stretching and foam rolling studies measure immediate, not long-term, effects.

Practical Cheat-Sheet

Here's how to apply the evidence in your training week:

  • For soreness:
    • Use CWI for tournament-style rapid recovery needs.
    • Otherwise, active recovery and deloads are enough.
  • Before lifting or sprinting:
    • 7–10 minutes dynamic warm-up.
    • Keep static stretches <30–60 seconds if included.
  • For flexibility & "feeling good":
    • Foam roll 60–120 seconds per area.
    • Expect soreness relief, not structural changes.
  • For muscle growth with limited loading:
    • Low-load BFR cycles (20–30% 1RM) can maintain size.
    • For strength, combine with heavier training when possible.

FAQs

Does static stretching reduce power? Yes - long holds (>60s) reduce strength and power. Short holds have trivial effects.

Is foam rolling worth it? Yes - for short-term ROM improvements and soreness reduction. Not for major performance boosts.

Are ice baths good for recovery? They reduce soreness but won't consistently improve next-day performance. Use for rapid turnaround needs.

Can BFR build muscle with light weights? Yes - hypertrophy is comparable to heavy lifting, though strength gains lag unless protocols are optimized.

Closing Thoughts

Training myths persist because they often contain a grain of truth - and because athletes are always looking for an edge. But modern science allows us to separate what's effective from what's just habit.

  • Ice baths: Good for soreness, not performance.
  • Static stretching before lifting: Keep it short or skip in favor of dynamic drills.
  • Foam rolling: Works for soreness and flexibility, not tissue breakdown.
  • Warm-ups: Dynamic is non-negotiable for explosive work.
  • BFR: Light loads can build size, but heavy loads remain king for strength.

By applying evidence-based practices, you'll not only perform better - you'll waste less time on ineffective strategies and reduce the risk of training setbacks.

References

  1. Machado AF, et al. Effects of cold water immersion after exercise on fatigue recovery and exercise performance: A meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2022. PMC9896520
  2. Behm DG, Chaouachi A. Acute Effects of Static Stretching on Muscle Strength and Power: An Attempt to Clarify Previous Caveats. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2019. PubMed31849713
  3. Liu Y, et al. Effects of different warm-up methods on acute lower-limb explosive performance: Systematic review & network meta-analysis. Front Physiol. 2023. PMC10463540
  4. Wiewelhove T, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of foam rolling on performance and recovery. Front Physiol. 2019. PMC6465761
  5. Bai J, et al. Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy in Untrained Males: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024. PubMed39598240
← Back to Blog