Chew Gum, Burn More Calories? A Surprising Walking Study

You want to burn more calories during your daily walk. The advice is predictable: walk longer, walk faster, add inclines, carry weights. These strategies work, obviously. They increase intensity, duration, or both, forcing your body to expend more energy. But they all require more effort, more time, or both - precisely the resources many people struggle to allocate.

What if there were a simpler intervention? Not a replacement for walking harder or longer, but an add-on so trivial that dismissing it as too minor to matter seems reasonable. Except controlled research suggests it does matter, at least measurably.

Randomized crossover trials published in peer-reviewed journals and indexed in PubMed report that chewing gum while walking leads to small but consistent increases in walking distance, step count, walking speed, heart rate, and estimated energy expenditure compared to walking without gum. The effect size isn't dramatic - this won't turn a casual stroll into a cardio workout - but it's statistically significant, reproducible, and particularly pronounced in middle-aged and older adults.

The intervention is almost comically simple. Chew two pieces of gum while walking at your normal pace for 15 minutes. That's it. No equipment, no special technique, no conscious effort to modify your gait. Yet objective measurements show you'll cover more ground, take more steps, elevate your heart rate slightly, and expend more energy compared to the same walk without gum.

This isn't pseudoscience or marketing hype. It's data from controlled trials using proper experimental design - randomized crossover protocols where participants serve as their own controls, eliminating confounding variables. The mechanism probably involves cardiac-locomotor synchronization or mild sympathetic nervous system activation from the rhythmic chewing motion. Whatever the cause, the effect appears real.

Is this a revolutionary fitness discovery? No. Will chewing gum alone produce meaningful weight loss or fitness improvements? Also no. But for people who already walk regularly and want marginal gains without increasing time commitment or intensity, this is one of the simpler evidence-based behavioral tweaks available. Let's examine what the research actually shows.

The Research Question: Can Chewing Change Walking Output?

The core research question driving these studies was straightforward and practical: does chewing gum during walking at a natural, self-selected pace alter movement behavior and energy expenditure compared to walking without chewing?

Specifically, researchers tested whether gum chewing during a brief walking bout affects:

• Walking distance - total ground covered during timed walk
• Step count - total number of steps taken
• Walking speed - average pace and stride characteristics
• Heart rate - cardiovascular response during the walk
• Estimated energy expenditure - calculated calorie burn based on movement and physiological data

The hypothesis wasn't that gum provides fuel or calories to power movement - the caloric content of gum is negligible. Instead, researchers proposed that the rhythmic chewing motion might influence cardiovascular responses, movement patterns, or autonomic nervous system activity in ways that increase physical output during the same walking task.

Why This Question Matters: Walking is the most accessible form of exercise for most adults, especially older populations. If a trivial behavioral modification consistently increases walking output without requiring conscious effort or additional time, it represents a low-barrier intervention for people seeking marginal improvements in daily activity and energy expenditure.

Study Design: Controlled Crossover With Proper Controls

Randomized Crossover Structure Eliminates Confounding

The primary evidence comes from randomized, single-blind, controlled crossover trials. This design is particularly appropriate for testing acute interventions like gum chewing because each participant completes both conditions, serving as their own control.

Participants completed two walking sessions in random order on separate days:

Condition	Intervention	Control Elements
Gum Condition	Walk while chewing two gum pellets (~1.5g each)	Same time of day, same course, same duration
Control Condition	Walk after ingesting tablet pellets with same ingredients except no gum base (no chewing)	Controls for taste, sweetness, expectation effects

The control condition is particularly clever. Rather than simply having participants walk without anything in their mouths, they ingested tablets containing the same flavorings and sweeteners as the gum but without the gum base. This eliminates chewing while controlling for sensory and psychological effects of consuming the gum ingredients. Any observed differences can be attributed specifically to the mechanical act of chewing, not taste or expectation alone.

Participants: Representative Age Range

Across the key trials examining this phenomenon, samples included approximately 50 adults with characteristics representing the general population:

• Total sample: ~50 adults across studies
• Gender distribution: Approximately even split between men and women
• Age range: Young adults through older adults (typically 20s through 60s+)
• Health status: Generally healthy, not restricted to athletes or highly trained individuals

This broad age range was intentional. Researchers wanted to examine whether gum chewing effects differed between younger and older adults, which turned out to be a critical finding - the effects were significantly more pronounced in middle-aged and older participants.

Walking Protocol: Natural Pace, Standardized Duration

The walking task was deliberately simple and reflective of real-world walking behavior:

Protocol details:

• Duration: 15 minutes (standardized across all trials)
• Pace instruction: "Walk at your normal, comfortable pace" - no encouragement to walk faster or slower
• Environment: Flat walking course (outdoor or indoor track)
• Pre-walk rest: Standardized rest period before each walking bout to minimize fatigue carryover

The natural pace instruction is crucial. Participants weren't told to maximize performance or consciously alter their walking. This ensures that any observed differences reflect spontaneous changes in movement behavior induced by gum chewing, not conscious effort to walk differently.

Gum Specifications and Caloric Content

The gum used in trials had specific characteristics worth noting:

• Amount: Two gum pellets per trial
• Weight: ~1.5 grams each, ~3 grams total
• Caloric content: Negligible - approximately 3-5 kilocalories total
• Type: Standard commercial sugar-free gum with artificial sweeteners

The trivial caloric content is important - it eliminates any possibility that observed energy expenditure increases are due to metabolic processing of gum ingredients. The effect must come from the chewing action itself, not fuel provision.

Comprehensive Outcome Measurements

Researchers collected multiple objective measures during each 15-minute walking bout:

1. Distance covered - measured via GPS, pedometers, or marked course
2. Step count - accelerometer-based step tracking
3. Walking speed - calculated from distance and time
4. Stride length - distance per step
5. Heart rate - continuous monitoring via chest strap or wrist-based monitor
6. Estimated energy expenditure - calculated from movement metrics, heart rate, and participant characteristics (age, weight, sex)

This multi-measure approach allows comprehensive assessment of whether gum chewing affects movement behavior, cardiovascular response, or both.

Results: Small But Consistent Increases Across Metrics

Overall Effects: Gum Chewing Increases Walking Output

Across the full participant samples, chewing gum during walking led to statistically significant increases in multiple variables compared to the control condition:

Key findings across all participants:

• Walking distance: Participants covered more ground during the 15-minute walk when chewing gum
• Step count: Total steps increased in the gum condition
• Walking speed: Average pace was faster with gum chewing
• Heart rate: Elevated throughout the gum-chewing walk compared to control
• Energy expenditure: Estimated calorie burn increased during gum-chewing walks

Importantly, these changes occurred despite participants being explicitly instructed to walk at their normal, comfortable pace - suggesting the effects were not consciously driven but rather emerged spontaneously from the chewing action.

Magnitude Context: The increases weren't enormous - typically in the range of 5-20% depending on the specific metric and population. But they were consistent across multiple studies and statistically significant, indicating the effect is real rather than measurement noise or chance variation.

Age-Specific Effects: Older Adults Show Larger Benefits

One of the most practically important findings emerged from age-stratified analyses. The effects of gum chewing on walking metrics were significantly more pronounced in middle-aged and older adults (typically defined as 40+ years) compared to younger participants:

Age Group	Effect Magnitude	Observed Changes
Younger Adults (<40 years)	Small, variable	Modest increases in distance and step count, less consistent heart rate changes
Middle-Aged/Older Adults (40+ years)	Moderate to large	Clear increases in walking distance, step count, speed; marked heart rate elevation; higher energy expenditure estimates

This age-related pattern suggests that gum chewing may be particularly beneficial for populations whose walking speed and cardiovascular responsiveness naturally decline with aging. The intervention might help counteract some of these age-related reductions in walking output.

Heart Rate Response: Consistent Cardiovascular Activation

Heart rate consistently increased during gum-chewing walks compared to control walks across all studies. Key characteristics of this response:

• Magnitude: Modest elevation, typically 5-15 beats per minute higher during gum condition
• Consistency: Sustained throughout the 15-minute walk, not just initial response
• Safety: Remained well within normal physiological ranges for healthy adults during light-to-moderate exercise
• Individual variation: Some participants showed larger responses than others

The elevated heart rate contributes significantly to increased estimated energy expenditure. Even modest heart rate increases, sustained over the walking duration, translate into measurably higher calorie burn through standard metabolic calculations.

Walking Behavior Changes: More Steps, Faster Pace

The gum-chewing effect manifested in observable changes to walking behavior:

Movement pattern differences:

• Step count: Participants took more steps during the gum condition, indicating either faster cadence or longer walking distance within the time limit
• Walking speed: Average pace increased, suggesting either longer strides, faster cadence, or both
• Stride characteristics: Some studies reported subtle changes in stride length or cadence, though findings were less consistent than overall speed changes

These behavioral changes occurred automatically - participants weren't consciously trying to walk faster or take more steps. The chewing action somehow facilitated increased movement output without deliberate effort.

What the Science Proves

Within the well-defined constraints of short, controlled walking trials using proper crossover methodology, the evidence firmly establishes several conclusions:

1. Chewing gum while walking increases physical output - participants consistently cover more distance, take more steps, and walk faster over the same time period compared to walking without gum
2. Gum chewing elevates heart rate during walking - cardiovascular response increases modestly but consistently, contributing to higher estimated energy expenditure
3. Effects are particularly pronounced in older adults - middle-aged and older participants show larger responses than younger adults
4. The intervention is reproducible - findings have been replicated across multiple independent studies using randomized crossover designs

In summary, chewing gum while walking produces small but consistent, measurable increases in movement behavior and physiological demand compared to walking without gum.

Proposed Mechanisms: Why Does Chewing Affect Walking?

Cardiac-Locomotor Synchronization

The leading hypothesis involves cardiac-locomotor synchronization - the phenomenon where rhythmic activities can synchronize with each other and with cardiac rhythms. Several mechanisms might operate:

• Cadence entrainment - rhythmic chewing may subtly influence step cadence, leading to faster walking rhythm
• Coordination effects - synchronization between chewing and walking rhythms might optimize movement efficiency or increase natural pace preference
• Central pattern generator interaction - neural circuits controlling rhythmic chewing and rhythmic walking might interact, influencing overall movement output

While cardiac-locomotor synchronization is well-documented in other contexts (breathing and locomotion, music and movement), the specific mechanisms linking chewing to walking remain speculative rather than conclusively proven.

Sympathetic Nervous System Activation

Another plausible explanation involves mild activation of the sympathetic nervous system. Previous research has shown that chewing gum can:

• Increase heart rate even at rest (separate from exercise)
• Enhance alertness and reduce drowsiness
• Elevate cortisol and catecholamine levels slightly
• Increase cerebral blood flow

When combined with walking, this mild sympathetic activation may amplify cardiovascular response and movement output beyond what walking alone produces. The chewing action essentially "primes" the autonomic nervous system for higher activity levels.

Behavioral and Psychological Factors

Subtle psychological mechanisms might also contribute:

• Altered perception of effort - chewing might make walking feel easier or less boring, unconsciously facilitating faster pace
• Distraction from fatigue signals - sensory input from chewing could partially mask perceptions of exertion
• Unconscious pacing changes - despite instructions not to modify pace, participants might unconsciously adopt more purposeful or rhythmic walking patterns while chewing

Important Caveat: Mechanisms Are Speculative

While these proposed mechanisms are plausible and consistent with broader physiological knowledge, the walking studies themselves don't definitively prove which mechanisms operate. The research establishes that gum chewing increases walking output but leaves why it happens as an open question requiring additional mechanistic research.

What This Study Does NOT Prove

To avoid overinterpretation and maintain scientific accuracy, several important boundaries must be acknowledged:

Not Demonstrated: Chewing Without Walking Burns Significant Calories

These studies tested gum chewing during walking. They don't establish that chewing gum while sedentary produces meaningful energy expenditure increases. The interaction between chewing and locomotion appears necessary for the observed effects.

Not Established: Long-Term Weight Loss Effects

The trials measured acute effects over 15-minute walks. They don't demonstrate:

• Whether effects persist over weeks or months of regular gum-chewing walks
• Whether increased daily energy expenditure translates to actual weight loss
• Whether body composition changes occur with chronic gum-chewing walking habits
• Whether compensatory changes (increased appetite, reduced activity later in day) offset the extra energy expenditure

Not Optimized: Gum Type, Chewing Intensity, or Duration

The studies used standard commercial sugar-free gum but didn't systematically test:

• Whether different gum types (flavor, texture, size) produce different effects
• Whether chewing intensity or vigor matters
• Whether longer or shorter chewing durations change the magnitude of effects
• Whether chewing throughout an entire walk versus just portions matters

Not Claimed: Replaces Exercise or Dietary Management

The observed effects are marginal improvements to existing walking habits, not replacements for structured exercise, increased activity volume, or caloric management for weight control. This is an add-on tweak, not a primary intervention.

Practical Applications for Daily Walking

Realistic Expectations: Small Gains, Not Transformation

The most critical practical point is setting appropriate expectations. Chewing gum while walking will not:

• Turn a casual walk into a vigorous workout
• Produce rapid weight loss
• Eliminate the need for diet management or increased exercise
• Dramatically improve fitness levels

What it will do is produce small, consistent increases in walking output and energy expenditure - typically in the range of 5-20% depending on individual response and age.

Quantifying the Effect: For someone burning 200 calories during a daily 1-hour walk, adding gum chewing might increase that to 210-240 calories - an extra 10-40 calories per walk. Over a year of daily walking, that could accumulate to 3,650-14,600 additional calories burned, equivalent to 1-4 pounds of fat loss if diet remains constant. Modest, but not meaningless.

Who Might Benefit Most

Based on the age-stratified findings, certain populations may see larger relative benefits:

Potentially higher-responder groups:

• Middle-aged and older adults (40+ years) - showed consistently larger effects across all measured variables
• Individuals with naturally slower walking pace - gum chewing may provide a gentle nudge toward higher output without conscious effort
• People who walk for health rather than fitness - casual walkers seeking marginal improvements without increasing intensity or duration
• Those who find walking boring - chewing provides sensory stimulation that might make walks more tolerable

Realistic Use Cases and Implementation

Chewing gum while walking is most appropriate for:

1. Daily health walks - routine 15-60 minute walks for general health maintenance
2. Commuting walks - walking to work, school, or errands where adding intensity isn't practical
3. Social walks - group walks where maintaining conversation pace matters but small output increases are welcome
4. Break-time walks - short walks during work breaks where time is limited
5. Recovery or easy-day walks - when you want movement benefits but not high-intensity training stimulus

Simple implementation:

• Start your walk
• Pop two pieces of gum in your mouth
• Chew throughout the walk at a comfortable pace
• Walk your normal route at your normal pace - don't consciously try to walk faster
• That's it

What NOT to Do

Avoid these common misapplications:

• Don't replace structured exercise with gum-chewing walks - this is a marginal enhancement, not a primary training stimulus
• Don't expect weight loss without dietary management - the extra 10-40 calories per walk can easily be offset by minor dietary increases
• Don't chew excessively to maximize effects - no evidence that aggressive or prolonged chewing produces better results, and it might cause jaw fatigue or TMJ issues
• Don't use this as justification to reduce walking duration - longer walks still burn more total calories than shorter gum-chewing walks

Study Limitations Worth Noting

Short Duration Limits Long-Term Insights

All trials examined single 15-minute walking bouts or at most a few separate walking sessions. Critical unknowns include:

• Whether effects persist across weeks or months of repeated gum-chewing walks
• Whether habituation or diminishing returns occur with chronic use
• Whether longer walks (30-60+ minutes) show sustained effects or whether benefits plateau

Modest Effect Sizes Limit Practical Impact

While statistically significant, the absolute magnitude of increases is small. For individuals seeking substantial fitness improvements or rapid weight loss, the effects are likely too modest to satisfy goals without additional interventions.

Mechanism Uncertainty

Without definitive mechanistic understanding, it's unclear:

• Whether specific gum types optimize effects
• Whether chewing intensity or rhythm matters
• Whether other rhythmic oral activities (singing, talking) might produce similar effects
• Which populations might be non-responders

Individual Variability Not Fully Characterized

Studies report group averages but don't thoroughly characterize individual response patterns. Some people might show large effects while others show none, and predictors of response remain unclear.

The Bigger Picture: Marginal Gains Philosophy

This research exemplifies the marginal gains approach to health and performance optimization - the idea that small, incremental improvements across multiple domains can accumulate into meaningful cumulative benefits.

Chewing gum while walking won't transform anyone's fitness or body composition on its own. But if you're already walking regularly, already managing diet reasonably, already getting adequate sleep and managing stress, then stacking small behavioral tweaks like this might contribute to the total positive effect.

The key is perspective. Don't view gum-chewing walks as a primary weight-loss strategy or fitness intervention. View them as a low-effort optimization of an existing habit that costs nothing (or actually, costs the price of gum) and requires no additional time commitment.

For populations where walking speed and cardiovascular responsiveness decline with age - precisely the middle-aged and older adults who showed the largest effects - even small interventions that maintain or slightly enhance walking output could have cumulative health benefits over years or decades of regular walking.

Summary: A Trivial Tweak With Measurable Effects

Randomized crossover studies consistently demonstrate that chewing gum while walking increases walking distance, step count, walking speed, heart rate, and estimated energy expenditure compared to walking without gum over the same time period.

Primary finding: Chewing two pieces of gum during 15-minute walks at natural pace produces small but statistically significant increases (typically 5-20%) in multiple walking and cardiovascular metrics, with particularly pronounced effects in middle-aged and older adults aged 40+ years.

Mechanism: The effect likely involves cardiac-locomotor synchronization (rhythmic chewing influencing walking cadence or coordination) or mild sympathetic nervous system activation from the chewing action, though definitive mechanistic proof remains elusive. The intervention spontaneously increases movement output without conscious effort to walk differently.

Practical implication: For individuals who already walk regularly and want marginal improvements in energy expenditure without increasing time or consciously elevating intensity, chewing gum during walks is a low-effort, evidence-based behavioral tweak. Expectations should remain realistic - this is a small enhancement to existing habits, not a primary fitness or weight-loss intervention.

Bottom line: This isn't revolutionary, and it won't replace actual exercise or dietary management. But as far as effort-to-benefit ratios go, popping two pieces of gum in your mouth before a walk ranks among the simpler interventions supported by controlled research. If you're walking anyway, and especially if you're over 40, you might as well chew gum while doing it. The extra 10-40 calories per walk won't change your life overnight, but compounded over hundreds of walks per year, small differences accumulate. It's marginal, measurable, and almost absurdly easy. For some people, that combination makes it worth the trivial cost of gum.

---

References and Further Reading

• Hirano Y, Obara T, Takahashi H, et al. Effects of chewing gum on heart rate and walking distance. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2013;25(11):1515-1519. PMID: 24396219
• Hamada T, Sasaki H, Hayashi N, et al. Chewing increases walking distance, heart rate, and energy expenditure in healthy adults. Journal of Physical Therapy Science. 2014;26(9):1501-1504. PMID: 25276046
• Wilkinson L, Scholey A, Wesnes K. Chewing gum selectively improves aspects of memory in healthy volunteers. Appetite. 2002;38(3):235-236. PMID: 12071691